Definitions & Methodology
Jump to:
About This Page
This page summarizes the methodology used to collect, categorize, and analyze the data presented in the Climate Innovation Funding Tracker. EDF plans to update and expand the Tracker over time. We will revise this page with each major update to include developments such as changes in scope or methodology.
About the Climate Innovation Funding Tracker
The Climate Innovation Funding Tracker is a public website and data visualization tool developed by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) in collaboration with David Gardiner and Associates and Outright to track and analyze U.S. government spending on climate innovation. The Innovation Tracker includes information on the climate innovation expenditures of the main climate-related executive branch agencies to provide a picture of the U.S. federal climate innovation budget. This page includes important information for interpreting the Innovation Tracker — including definitions, data sources, methods and caveats — and will be updated regularly.
The Innovation Tracker is intended to serve as a living resource for policymakers, climate advocates and the public to better understand federal spending on climate innovation. The categorization of federal programs is an inherently complex task. It includes nuanced decisions around what qualifies as climate innovation; what categories are relevant for which programs at what scale; how to handle federal funding of ongoing agency operations and how different types of federal investments (e.g., grants, tax credits and loans) can be compared effectively. Our methodology, while designed to be scientific, transparent and reproducible, is expected to stimulate discussion and we value that discussion as a critical and necessary part of the work. We welcome any feedback or suggestions for improvements to this resource.
Defining Climate Innovation
Definitions for the key terms and categories included in the Innovation Tracker are provided below.
Climate Innovation | The creation and application of new or enhanced climate solutions through technology, public policy, and investment models. This includes solutions for mitigating (“mitigation”), adapting to (“adaptation”) and better understanding the nature and impacts of climate change (“climate science”). |
---|---|
Climate Innovation Funding | U.S. government spending — including executive branch budget authority and estimated tax credit expenditures — dedicated to programs which support climate innovation. |
Mitigation | Activities dedicated to the research, development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies and processes to reduce, reuse, or sequester greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., development of clean energy technologies, natural climate solutions and other potential climate solutions). |
Adaptation | Activities dedicated to the research, development, and deployment of technologies and processes to prepare or adjust human and natural systems to climate impacts (e.g., hardening of grid infrastructure, wildfire prevention and development of drought-tolerant crop varieties). |
Climate Science | Activities dedicated to the research, development and deployment of technologies and processes to improve human understanding of the science and impacts of climate change (e.g., atmospheric monitoring, climate and weather modeling and data gathering). |
Data Scope
The below table outlines the scope of the data collected for the current version of the Innovation Tracker. EDF plans to expand this scope over time for greater completeness. Updates will be reflected in the table below.
Data Parameters | Details for Current Version |
---|---|
Date of Last Update | 01/04/2024 |
Types of Climate Funding Included (e.g., Mitigation, Adaptation, Climate Science) | Mitigation only |
Fiscal Years Included | 2021-2023 |
Agencies Included | U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),* U.S. Department of Interior (DOI), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)** * Data for USDA do not include programs funded through the Farm Bill. ** Data for DOI and EPA are currently only included for programs funded through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). |
Funding Sources Included (e.g., Appropriations, Tax Credits, Other Legislation) | Enacted Annual Appropriations (FY21-23) The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (FY22-23) The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (FY22-23) |
What IS Included | We used the following criteria to determine which government programs to include in the Tracker. We included programs that:
|
What IS NOT Included | While many programs could be considered to support climate innovation, the following programs were NOT included, due to the more limited relevance to climate innovation, reproducibility, and/or difficulty in achieving data consistency:
|
Data Sources & Methods
This section describes the data collection methodologies and sources used. Updates to the data collection methodologies will be reflected in the table below.
Data Type | Sources & Methods |
---|---|
Funding Levels |
**Both the IIJA and IRA included enacted appropriations for programs over multiple years but did not always specify an amount for each fiscal year. To provide an estimate of the annual appropriations for those programs, we divided the total enacted appropriations level by the number of years the law made the funding available. For example, for a program that first receives appropriations in FY22, whose description specifies the funding is ‘available until September 30, 2030’, we divided the total enacted funding by 9 years to determine the annualized amount. |
Information on Program Activities | Information on program activities, which was used to assign funding amongst the different categories (e.g., sector, solution, innovation stage, etc.) was gathered from agency budget justifications and agency websites. |
Category Assignment
After collecting climate innovation funding amounts by program, we then categorized this funding to make it easier to view the data through different lenses that can help to enhance understanding of how the climate innovation budget is distributed. These categories are described in greater detail below.
Category | Description |
---|---|
Agency | The Agency category describes the government agency and its sub-offices that are responsible for a given climate innovation program, as described by the following hierarchy:
|
Sector | Describes the economic sector that is supported by the program. Programs were assigned to one or more of the following sectors:
|
Solution | Describes the type of technology (or set of technologies) that is supported by the program. Programs were assigned to one or more of the following solutions:
|
Innovation Stage | Describes the phase of technology development that is supported by the program. Programs were assigned to one or more of the following innovation stages:
|
Funding Type | Describes the type of government spending that funds the program. Funding types currently accounted for in the Tracker include:
|
Funding Source | The Funding Source category provides the name of the piece of Congressional legislation that provided the funding for the program. |
Data Caveats
Categorizing federal programs according to sector, solution and innovation stage relies on judgment calls and, in cases where funding applies to multiple options within a category, the use of rough estimates to determine the relative amounts of funding dedicated to each option. Accordingly, both individual and aggregate funding allocated to these categories should be interpreted as ballpark estimates rather than precise amounts, with the exception of the Agency category.
Each program is assigned to one or more of the classifications listed under each of the categories in the table above. In some cases, funding is split between multiple classifications within a category. For example, a program may support both the power and transportation sectors. If the program description provided a clear split for the program funding (e.g., 20% for power and 80% for transportation), we split the funding within the Sector category accordingly. If the description did not specify how the funding was divided, we split it evenly among the classifications within the category (e.g., to use the example above, 50% for power and 50% for transportation). The full program funding amount was never double-counted within a category.
In those cases where one program’s funding counted for multiple options within multiple categories (e.g., sector, solution, innovation phase), the full amount of funding was allocated individually to each category, assuming that the categorization in one area had no impact or association with the categorization in another. For instance, if a program’s funding is estimated as being split 50-50 between the power and transportation sectors and 50-50 between the research and development (R&D) and deployment innovation stages, the tool does not distinguish how much of the program’s power sector spending went toward R&D and does not necessarily follow that 25% of program funding is dedicated to power sector R&D.